With all of the hub-bub around broadband build out, it is important not to forget about utilization… and how you drive meaningful utilization in your community.

A great compliment to our recently announced Market Demand Snapshot is an Action Plan for Broadband Utilization.  Designed to spur economic development and job creation, and incorporating feedback from stakeholder workshops, SNG can provide you with will provide the tactics, methods and tools needed to drive broadband adoption and meaningful use.

As we continuously preach, broadband availability alone is not enough to realize its social and economic benefits.  An understanding of how to effectively use of broadband for commerce, citizen services and the positioning of rural counties as attractive areas for 21st century business and living will play a critical factor in their long-term success of your broadband investment and  your ability to impact the lives of the citizens and businesses already located in the regions.

SNG can help your region with effective strategic planning for impactful economic development with a sound, three-step approach:

  1. Identifying and rallying the key stakeholders that need to be actively engaged in the economic development through broadband adoption process via the application of broadband best practices;
  2. Laying the foundations for an actionable strategic plan that will enhance broadband adoption, meaningful use and job creation across identified verticals of interest, e.g. residences, schools, businesses, libraries, healthcare facilities, public safety and government;
  3. Driving efficiencies into the community through the adoption of digital purposes and broadband enabled applications that increase quality of life, the growth of economic and employment opportunities, and spurring commercial investment locally.

If you are interested in learning more about how this structured approach can drive demand, adoption and meaningful use to advance your region’s ability to compete globally, attract investment, realize efficiencies, and create jobs, contact Michael Curri.

Charles Berry

Our friend and colleague Charles Berry passed away at this past Friday. He was 42 – much too young. We loved him dearly.

His life was filled with adventure and achievement, love and laughter. Charles spent every waking hour living life to its fullest – and his ambition and love of life often drove him to sleep deprivation. During his time with us, Charles crammed as much life into every day as anyone you could ever meet..

Charles used to say with pride that he and his family could pack and be on their way to their next adventure in a few hours. He and his childhood best friend and wife Dawn saw so much of this world as work and thirst for cultural diversity and life experiences saw them set down not only coast-to-coast in the United States, but in Japan, India, and France. He dearly loved the Cannes in the French Riviera and the Georgia Coast and wanted us all to experience them with him. Other than his childhood home of St. Louis, the past 4 years in Cleveland were the longest Charles and Dawn had stayed in one place.  “Too much to see and do,” Charles used to say with his infectious smile.

Charles was a brilliant man, evidenced by his numerous career achievements, which culminated in the formation of his own venture with a small group of partners – a broadband consulting firm named Gigabit Squared, which now serves clients all over the globe. It is ironic and sad that Charles’ untimely death came at a point in his life when he was going to get “back to seeing the world” and travelling. The past few months Charles was happier than ever – ready to take on and conquer challenges all over the globe as the company he had help build was ready to take off.

But Charles’ brilliance was most evident when he shared a dinner with a friend – and discussed politics, religion, business, or even the intricacies of the NBA, NFL, or Soccer. Charles was quite competitive and loved a challenge – so he was drawn to friends and colleagues who he could banter back and forth with for hours. Always good natured, always with a laugh and an excited smile, Charles would – as many of his friends called it – ‘hold us hostage,’ saying ‘just five more minutes’ so that we could continue the debate, discussion, and laughs. Time with Charles was always challenging and exhilarating – he was going to push you and laugh with you and make sure that he challenged any of your preconceived beliefs. He loved playing the Devil’s Advocate because he could argue either side of a position brilliantly, and he loved to challenge the minds of the people he cared about.

While Charles was fiercely proud of his nomadic, go anywhere lifestyle with no geographic roots – the roots he did put down were with the people in his life. Fiercely loyal, if Charles counted you a friend, you were a friend for life, no matter the distance. He spent so much time with the people in his life every day that often his workday ended up being 8 p.m. to 5 a.m.

He leaves behind his wife, childhood best friend Dawn, and daughter Magda, 11, and son Nigel, 9. While our relationship with Charles was mostly away from his family, there was no doubt to any of us that they were always close to him. And when we saw Charles with his wife and children, his smile grew even bigger and the twinkle in his eye was less mischievous nature and much more reflecting pure love and admiration for the family that he adored. His children will always know that Daddy loved them more than anything in this world.

We are all still in shock with the untimely passing of our dear friend. Not a day will go by without some reflection, a memory of laughter with this big hearted man. We will miss him dearly, but know what he would tell us. That it is our job to pick up and keep going. To let his life serve as a reminder to pack every bit of life, love, and laugher into every day. There was really no one else like Charles. As his friends, it will be our charter to honor him by challenging our minds, taking time for friends and family, and remember, as he used to tell us, “not take all of this so seriously.”

Economuse, 8 July 2011, by John de Ridder


 

The benefits of broadband are derived from how it is used; not just having access. While the supply plan is well-developed, there is no execution plan yet to ensure that faster broadband is fully exploited and that without an action plan that engages end-users directly, the expected benefits of broadband will not be realised.

At last, the focus on the NBN is shifting from supply -“When and what will we get?”-  to demand -“How  will we use it?”.  The benefits of broadband are derived from how it is used; not just having access. While the supply plan is well-developed, there is no execution plan yet to ensure that faster broadband is fully exploited. Without an action plan that engages end-users directly, the expected benefits of broadband will not be realised.

Let’s take telework as an example. It is an obvious application for fast broadband and we have known about that for a long time. To his credit, Senator Conroy has set some quantitative targets to be reached by 2020 for the eight goals of the National Digital Economy Strategy. In the case of telework, the goal is to “double the level of teleworking so that at least 12% of Australian employees may work away from the traditional workplace”. That implies it is about 6% now – right?

Wrong. The latest figure we have is indeed 6% but it comes from an ABS Time Use Survey conducted in 2006 – the figure is 5 years old! Worse, the next survey will not be conducted until 2013 with results not available until 2014. The hard 12% target may not be so hard to get – I suspect that with the changes in broadband availability over the last 5 years, we may already be at 12%.

My point is that if you cannot measure it, you cannot manage it. We have a strategy and goals but no framework for execution that provides better information on where we currently are. Furthermore, we do not have actionable intelligence on barriers to adoption and gaps that will need to be addressed.

It is not difficult to fix; although I should declare an interest in the proposed solution.

The Government’s 12% target for telework may have been inspired by the reference in the NDES document to 11% of US employees teleworking at least 1 day a month. That must be an old figure. Last year, the Strategic Networks Group (SNG) found that 18.9% on average (25.6% in metro areas) teleworked in North Carolina; with about half of these reporting that they telework more than 3 days a week!

What we need is e-solutions benchmarking data gathered directly from organisations and households that not only provides more current data of progress towards NDES goals, but also maps drivers and barriers to utilisation and captures the benefits. In the case of telework, for example, comparisons for the same type of organisation across different regions would point to where non-users could usefully be educated about the benefits. The framework that SNG uses also allows individual respondents to compare themselves with their peers.

Case studies like those to be presented at the DBCDE-AIIA teleworking forum on the 3rd of August are fine. But there is no reason to expect that preaching the virtues will be any more successful than it has been to-date. We need an execution framework that engages end-users directly, which in itself promotes awareness and drives utilisation of broadband-enabled solutions.

 

John de Ridder represents the Strategic Networks Group (SNG; www.sngroup.com ) in Australia.

 

Note: The 6% figure is used in the ABS Household Use of Information Technology, Australia, 2007-08, Cat No 8146.0, 18 December 2008

Tweeting in the Dark… Utilization is (Still) the Key

by Doug Adams
We’ve been talking for months in Bandwidth about Awareness not equaling Adoption… and along with it adoption not begetting Utilization. No matter who might ask you to take a leap of faith, they are not the same, and it is our job to push the boulder up the hill and go from awareness to adoption to usage.

Put another way, just because you have broadband does not mean people will use it… and just because people are using broadband does not mean they are fully realizing the socio-economic benefits:

Typically, and for good reason, we are talking about driving business enablers and e-solutions as the utilization the key to delivering benefits and impacts. And while that remains what we focus on at SNG, let’s take a look at the “lighter side” of the Internet to illustrate just how meaningful utilization can be. And we’re not sure you can get much lighter than social networking.

Recent findings show that in the United States, Twitter’s awareness (we’ll use this as a parallel to coverage), adoption, and utilization are very different.

Looking at what might be considered its big brother, or a brother on steroids, we see that 42% of online Americans last year and a projected 57% this year are actively using Facebook.

I can’t use the classic ‘first to market’ explanation to describe why utilization is higher for one than the other. Otherwise, we’d all be on Friendster or My Space.

For Facebook, adoption is awfully close to usage, with a whopping 70% of users logging on daily.  They are closing the gap between adoption and utilization – remember it is our position that adoption is pointless without utilization – by being, in social media circles, compelling.

But what makes something ‘compelling’ or what drives utilization? In Facebook’s case I know that I, for one, feel like if I don’t login that I will miss something.  I don’t feel that way with Twitter, and apparently I am not alone.

So back to the world of economic needs and improving quality of life – we’re investing in broadband and e-solutions to drive economic efficiencies and create growth opportunities. These include reaching new markets, developing new business models, creating new relationships with partners and clients.

It is our job to make that feeling of ‘missing out’ a tangible, understandable reason to utilize e-solutions to drive prosperity and growth. Our goal is to ‘personalize’ the return on investment to individual businesses, organizations and households.

SNG’s research, including the DEi scorecard does just that, showing your local businesses what they need to do and the applications they should adapt in order to realize cost efficiencies and  increase revenues. This helps make sure that your region does not miss out… on its potential, and on opportunities.

 

e-Solutions Benchmarking (eSB) in Action

We’re often asked, specifically, “How does an eSB help our region make better decisions and guide investment? Below are a few examples of how an eSB has helped other regions…

Scenario 1: If fiber is going to be available to Professional and Technical Service firms in your region (i.e. county or economic development region) and the Executive’s focus (i.e. governor) is best practices in science and technology-based economic development – what services should e-Incubator staff promote in their awareness and outreach efforts to Professional and Technical Service firms?

Finding: The top e-solutions that Professional and Technical Service firms plan to use and need help with when on DSL are:

The difference in utilization between firms that are on DSL versus Fiber is significant across all seventeen (17) key e-solutions. If Professional and Technical Service firms are to be competitive, they will need to understand where they aren’t competitive and provide support and training to quickly and efficiently bridge those gaps.

The next question is to identify the most effective means of getting the required information and skill development to these firms.

Findings: Self-directed online learning is the preferred method of information and skill development for professional and technical service businesses.

The top three preferred methods are online reference materials, direct research with vendors, and live webinars with experts. The two least preferred methods are formal classroom and formal online courses.

Scenario 2: There is pressure to improve the productivity and quality of public services, while reducing costs. Senior planning staff have been directed to identify areas where public investments in broadband can be used to further these goals.

Findings: Two areas exhibit slow adoption of modern and cost effective delivery methods:

Telehealth services – Only 6.7 of health service providers currently provide telehealth services to patients in their home (with 3.2% adoption in progress and 7.1% planning to adopt). This is in spite of the finding that an average of over 70% of households are currently, planning or willing to explore telehealth services.  Increased use of telehealth services have the potential to improve access, while reducing costs and demand in such areas as emergency room visits.

Community services, counselling – Only 13.5% of service providers currently provide remote counselling services through such means as live video. Another 3.5% are in the process of adoption and 9.3% are planning to adopt. This level of adoption is well below levels in mental health centers where tele-psychiatry is a proven and leading edge adopter of tele-health services (respective adoption levels are: 26.5% currently use; 5.9% in progress; 14.7 planning).

 

 

 

Quick Bytes

New Look
Have you visited www.sngroup.com lately? If you have, you may have noticed that the home page has undergone a minor facelift, designed to make navigating our site easier than ever.

e-NC and SNG Study Reveals Types of Home-Based Businesses
Data collected by SNG in North Carolina in 2010 showed that a third (32%) of households had some type of existing home-based business, with another 12% saying that they would start a home-based business within the next year.

This of course points to the fact that bringing robust Internet to the home, affordably, is not just about enabling leisure activity.  In fact, regional economic development depends on broadband to the home.

The top home-based businesses by industry sector (NAICS) are: 

Click on chart for a larger version.

So if you’re trying to retain and attract high-paying jobs to your region, ensure that you have a good broadband network and focus on marketing to professionals who can work from home.

 

Study Reveals Broadband Essential for Economic Development in Europe
According to a study published in May by the McKinsey Global Institute (Internet Matters), Europeans need to be connected if they are to enjoy the significant lifestyle and economic advantages. Not new ground, but what is interesting are some of the findings, directly connecting job creation with broadband, including:

Read more about the study by clicking here.

 

We’re often asked, specifically, “How does an eSB help our region make better decisions and guide investment? Below are a few examples of how an eSB has helped other regions…

Scenario 1: If fiber is going to be available to Professional and Technical Service firms in your region (i.e. county or economic development region) and the Executive’s focus (i.e. governor) is best practices in science and technology-based economic development – what services should e-Incubator staff promote in their awareness and outreach efforts to Professional and Technical Service firms?

Finding: The top e-solutions that Professional and Technical Service firms plan to use and need help with when on DSL are:

The difference in utilization between firms that are on DSL versus Fiber is significant across all seventeen (17) key e-solutions. If Professional and Technical Service firms are to be competitive, they will need to understand where they aren’t competitive and provide support and training to quickly and efficiently bridge those gaps.

The next question is to identify the most effective means of getting the required information and skill development to these firms.

Findings: Self-directed online learning is the preferred method of information and skill development for professional and technical service businesses.

The top three preferred methods are online reference materials, direct research with vendors, and live webinars with experts. The two least preferred methods are formal classroom and formal online courses.

Scenario 2: There is pressure to improve the productivity and quality of public services, while reducing costs. Senior planning staff have been directed to identify areas where public investments in broadband can be used to further these goals.

Findings: Two areas exhibit slow adoption of modern and cost effective delivery methods:

Telehealth services – Only 6.7 of health service providers currently provide telehealth services to patients in their home (with 3.2% adoption in progress and 7.1% planning to adopt). This is in spite of the finding that an average of over 70% of households are currently, planning or willing to explore telehealth services.  Increased use of telehealth services have the potential to improve access, while reducing costs and demand in such areas as emergency room visits.

Community services, counselling – Only 13.5% of service providers currently provide remote counselling services through such means as live video. Another 3.5% are in the process of adoption and 9.3% are planning to adopt. This level of adoption is well below levels in mental health centers where tele-psychiatry is a proven and leading edge adopter of tele-health services (respective adoption levels are: 26.5% currently use; 5.9% in progress; 14.7 planning).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

by Doug Adams
We’ve been talking for months in Bandwidth about Awareness not equaling Adoption… and along with it adoption not begetting Utilization. No matter who might ask you to take a leap of faith, they are not the same, and it is our job to push the boulder up the hill and go from awareness to adoption to usage.

Put another way, just because you have broadband does not mean people will use it… and just because people are using broadband does not mean they are fully realizing the socio-economic benefits:

Typically, and for good reason, we are talking about driving business enablers and e-solutions as the utilization the key to delivering benefits and impacts. And while that remains what we focus on at SNG, let’s take a look at the “lighter side” of the Internet to illustrate just how meaningful utilization can be. And we’re not sure you can get much lighter than social networking.

Recent findings show that in the United States, Twitter’s awareness (we’ll use this as a parallel to coverage), adoption, and utilization are very different.

Looking at what might be considered its big brother, or a brother on steroids, we see that 42% of online Americans last year and a projected 57% this year are actively using Facebook.

I can’t use the classic ‘first to market’ explanation to describe why utilization is higher for one than the other. Otherwise, we’d all be on Friendster or My Space.

For Facebook, adoption is awfully close to usage, with a whopping 70% of users logging on daily.  They are closing the gap between adoption and utilization – remember it is our position that adoption is pointless without utilization – by being, in social media circles, compelling.

But what makes something ‘compelling’ or what drives utilization? In Facebook’s case I know that I, for one, feel like if I don’t login that I will miss something.  I don’t feel that way with Twitter, and apparently I am not alone.

So back to the world of economic needs and improving quality of life – we’re investing in broadband and e-solutions to drive economic efficiencies and create growth opportunities. These include reaching new markets, developing new business models, creating new relationships with partners and clients.

It is our job to make that feeling of ‘missing out’ a tangible, understandable reason to utilize e-solutions to drive prosperity and growth. Our goal is to ‘personalize’ the return on investment to individual businesses, organizations and households.

SNG’s research, including the DEi scorecard does just that, showing your local businesses what they need to do and the applications they should adapt in order to realize cost efficiencies and  increase revenues. This helps make sure that your region does not miss out… on its potential, and on opportunities.

 

 

 

 

by Michael Curri
“We finally have broadband coverage, so are we done?”

Broadband is critical infrastructure, a means to an end – not the finish line. Neither broadband coverage alone nor adoption is sufficient to achieve your goals and outcomes. Only broadband utilization leads to desired economic and social benefits. What are they? That depends on your priorities…

Priorities differ across regions. But without significant utilization, it is unlikely desired outcomes will be achieved. Drivers and barriers must be identified, understood, and managed. Broadband coverage does not necessarily beget adoption… and adoption does not automatically beget effective utilization.

Leveraging broadband is at the heart of modern economic development. Whether the objective is retaining existing businesses and jobs, business growth, or improving the quality of jobs – e-solutions are critical enablers to drive participation in the digital economy. To realize the benefits of broadband – availability is important, but utilization is critical.

Most regions require planning, strategies, and the promotion of e-solutions utilization to leverage broadband infrastructure. This is a transition and a restructuring process critical to ensure your region can thrive in the global economy while delivering a high quality of life.

By uncovering existing barriers to e-solutions utilization, communities and regions can see whether they are positioned to compete in the digital economy. With these insights, it is possible to understand which e-solutions will have the most immediate and significant impact on the local economy. These insights are critical inputs to where your investment should be directed in bridging gaps and accelerating utilization. Let SNG work with you to develop your path forward along the broadband lifecycle.

by Thibauld Chatel
It is not that often I’ve met someone that is so impressive I’m compelled to tell the world about it. This is the story of just such a person.

Last Fall, SNG partnered with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) of Trondheim, providing support to an e-Solutions Benchmarking project on the hospitality sector of the Hardanger Fjord area in Norway, an area extremely dependent on tourism.

Amongst the respondents was the Hotel Ullensvang, a 300 bed hotel located just between mountain and sea.  The hotel’s use of broadband earned them a lofty score of 9 on a 10 point scale on SNG’s Digital Economy index (DEi) for broadband utilization.

In speaking with Geir Midtun, the IT manager of the hotel (yes they have one!), it became clear to me that they understand the very essence of what broadband can be: a powerful means for economic development.

“We are located quite remote from most of our clients and most of our suppliers. We have a two hours drive by car to the nearest railway station and a three hours drive to the nearest airport. Using the internet is our way of getting closer to our clients and suppliers, on a daily basis, and broadband makes it fast enough to be useful. Broadband is our connection to the rest of the world. We consider broadband one of the primary reasons we are able to do business the way that we do. A large hotel in a small rural village, remote and “exotic,” but still connected to the world.”

And so for example, broadband enables the hotel to host international seminars on a regular basis, in a place where you can now relax and do business without limits.

But how do they get there? Since broadband was introduced in the area in 2004, it has been an ongoing process of improvement, strongly supported by the hotel owners and managers. Every step they took was based on the remote location of the hotel and that they needed to be connected in order to thrive. As Geir explains, they can make a long, very long list of benefits and cost saving from using broadband and e-solutions.

“Computer systems, booking systems, TV-systems, ventilation and air condition systems etc. can be checked and maintained/serviced by ‘remote control.’ A few years ago, service personnel from Bergen had to make a six hours drive (back and forth) to do a job that perhaps took 15 minutes. Our credit card terminals now use broadband instead of the telephone lines. This enables full integration with the booking- and accounting software. Our sales staff can connect to our server when they are out travelling, to check availability and make bookings online from wherever they are, worldwide. Our accounting services are now taken care of by a company in Stavanger, 170 kilometers away. Thanks to broadband we can stay online with them all day long, without having to think about extra costs.”

Add to the list of benefits broadband brings are:

The Ullensvang hotel has 50 employees and is thriving in a remote area of Norway because of what they are doing with their broadband. Asked what the Ullensvang Hotel would be like without broadband, the hotel’s managing director, Hans Edmund, Utne explains that the Internet today are just as important to his business as roads were to his predecessor 100 years ago.  But this requires champions like Geir Midtun who understood how technology enabled by broadband could enhance and transform the hotel’s business.

By John DeRidder
There is a tension between under-investment without public investment (the “externalities” issue) and public investment “crowding out” private investment (the “level playing field” issue). Taking the latter approach puts national broadband plans and state economic development at risk.

An example of this playing-out is when on April 4th the State Legislature of North Carolina passed Bill H129, subsequently ratified by the State’s Senate, to “level the playing field” across public and private operators of fast broadband networks. In the same month Tennessee shelved legislation that would have allowed its local power utility and state-of-the-art broadband provider EPB to expand its service beyond its current operational area.

The NC curbs on public investment are intended to prevent unfair competition from “predatory” local governments by loading the prices of community networks with a commercial rate of return and the taxes and charges that would apply to a private operator. This “leveling of the playing field” argument sounds reasonable, but it ignores the main reason for public enterprise.

The fundamental reason for public enterprise is that it can make investments taking into account benefits that will not appear on its own books. Put another way, public enterprise can undertake unprofitable investment where there are community benefits (what economists call “positive externalities”) that would make the investment economically and socially desirable.

Few would have a problem with public broadband investment in regional areas where private investment is unprofitable. But, what about urban areas where private broadband networks may fail to recognize local demand? Advocates of public investment point to the Greenlight Community Network in Wilson, NC, which provides “up to” 100Mbps while the local cable company, Time Warner, offers Wilson residents “blazing speeds” of just 15Mbps on its Road Runner plan. H129 blocks the development of new community networks providing faster services than existing operators are willing to offer.

Why is this so? One important reason for restricting speeds is to protect margins on legacy data products sold to business. Incumbents prefer to sell existing data services than provide broadband services where they cannot differentiate so easily between business and residential customers. Contrast that with EPB’s network which is scaled to support 1Gbit/s to anyone – business or residential customer – that needs such speed.

There are no easy answers.

In other countries, an appropriate remedy is service competition enabled by forcing existing operators (not just the new public operators stipulated in H129) to open their networks (i.e. provide wholesale services). Currently, the FCC does not mandate open access for new fiber access networks, let alone existing broadband networks.

For new investments in “under-served” areas, a possible remedy is to provide a capital grant or subsidy to a private operator to make an investment profitable. This could be done through a public tender process. Conditions should also be attached to make the chosen network operator provide open access to enable competing services to be offered over the same network.

A practical and globally tested alternative is public investment in community networks such as Greenlight and EPB.

Our preliminary view is that while the focus of community networks should be “un-served” or “under-served” areas, there is no need to confine them outside city limits. Urban areas can justify some duplication and investments in existing networks are sunk and partly depreciated so they can compete on cost. Without un-fettered investment in community broadband networks, the economic and social benefits for all regions will not be realized.